We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
Samizdata quote of the day On July 23 virtually every news outlet in the United States ran some version of the following headline: “Turkey Joins the Fight Against ISIL; Opens Air Base to Coalition Forces; Washington and Ankara Agree to Safe Zone in Syria.” The media, being what it is, dubbed Ankara’s decision to order up airstrikes on Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s forces a “game changer”, which is what journalists say when they have nothing else to say, do not understand a situation and are itching to get back to covering Donald Trump.
– Steven Cook
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
The Turkish government is backing other dark forces in Syria.
Sadly there are many evil factions in the place.
Also the Turkish government is using the opportunity to hit the Kurds.
Anyone who believes Turkey is a reliable ally for anyone non-Islamic is a fool.
Anyone who believes Turkey is a reliable ally for anyone, even if they are also Islamic, is a fool.
True, so true.
That seems to be a very perceptive article. Certainly Turkey is no friend of the west generally or of the US particularly (and should never have been permitted to join NATO; whether it should be in the EU I leave to others). Its entry into the ISIS conflict at this particular moment in time is indeed curious, and I think Mr. Cook has it about right: the move is entirely politically motivated and has the specific objective of permitting Erdogan to attack Turkish Kurds without inducing objections from the US. I predict that any actions by his military forces against ISIS will be minimal, the very least he can plausibly get away with while remaining our nominal “ally” in that fight.
Cook observes that “anonymous U.S. military sources [are] telling the Wall Street Journal that they believe the Turks snookered the White House.” What, John Kerry being “snookered”? Incredible.