We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Rand nails ’em again

Rand Simberg has done another brilliant piss-take. Just imagine! Japan bombs Pearl Harbour and we go off and invade Italy! My, my….

Another one bites the dust

According to FEE Missouri has joined the free states:

Concealed-Handgun Law Passes in Missouri (9/12/03)

Lawmakers today granted most Missourians the right to carry concealed guns, overriding a veto by Gov. Bob Holden (D) and reversing the outcome of a statewide election on the issue four years ago. Missouri becomes the 45th state to allow concealed guns, although nine sharply restrict permits, according to the National Rifle Association. (Washington Post, Friday)

I understand Michigan is also very close to falling in line.

Correction: It’s Wisconsin, not Michigan

Rumsfeld again

Here’s another Rumsfeld quote, this one from his talk at the The National Press Club:

My view is — maybe it’s because I’ve been a business man for so many years, but my view is that governments can do relatively little for people, and that investment, outside investment, inside investment, people voting with their dollars that they want to make something work in a given place, is what really is the engine that drives things. Government doesn’t create the jobs, the opportunities, the wealth in our country; it doesn’t create the jobs and opportunities in most countries. Private investment does, human capital does. And that’s ultimately what will have to be the case in Iraq. Although they have the benefit of oil, and with some significant investments in their infrastructure, they could get significant increases in revenue from oil above where they currently are. But there’s no one thing that is the answer, in my view.

It’s rather hard to disagree with.

Words of Wisdom

I’m in the midst of my nightly reading and this dialogue from Donald Rumsfeld on Jim Lehrer’s News Hour caught my attention:

Now, there’s another reason it’s a bad idea. If you go to Afghanistan, the Soviet Union had 300,000 troops in Afghanistan and they couldn’t do the job. We have 10,000 in there and it’s making steady progress. Why? Because we don’t want to occupy a country. The Soviets wanted to own Afghanistan.

We don’t want to own Afghanistan. We don’t want to own Iraq. We want to help them get on their feet and then move out. We do not want to put so many forces in there that we create a dependency on us and then have to stay. We want to keep creating an environment where they can take over their security.

Maybe our way of looking at things is catching on.

Friends are where you find them

Here is today’s press release from an Iranian student group with ties to those inside Iran. I think you will appreciate it.

The 2nd anniversary of September 11th Tragedy and the Iranian Nation
SMCCDI (Public Statement)

September 11, 2003

Two years have passed since the “Tragedy of September 11th”. A tragedy resulting from an unprecedented terror attack on the US soil and which took thousands of innocent lives and left many grieving families behind.

Without the shadow of any doubt, this infamous attack was the true manifestation that fanatical Islamic Terrorism has no boundaries and is hell bent in uprooting all the advances achieved by the civilized World, replacing it with archaic beliefs along with an intolerant value system inherent in all overzealous religious sects.

September 11th occurred while the Iranians were commemorating their loved one’s massacre at the hands of the fascist-theological Islamic Republic regime. This is exactly why the Iranians, immediately felt in their bones the impact of this murderous act and sympathized with the Americans. Few hours later and in thousands, they took to the streets to support the wounded American Nation and to share its sorrow while undergoing the brutality of the regime’s shock troops. .

“America, America…. Condolences, Condolences!” and “Death to Taliban, whether in Kabul or Tehran” they chanted while holding their candle lights despite the brutal attacks of Hezbollahi thugs!!

Since then, Iranians have become more determined than ever to stand up against intolerance and tyranny as they saw the trueness of the unprecedented declaration of President George Bush on “War against Terror” and his revelation of the hideousness of religious fanaticism. They’ve regain hope by witnessing the overthrow first of the backwarded Taliban rulers in Afghanistan and then of the Iraq’s Bathist regime, two of the most notorious supporters and purveyors of global terrorism in contemporary international politics.

Without the shadow of any doubt, the Iranians, themselves the first victims of terrorism for nearly a quarter of a century, not only sympathize with the Americans, but they identify with them in this “Just war”. They’re are engaged in a daily battle to rid themselves of their monstrous regime known for being the “Mother of Islamist Terrorism” and a notorious member of the “Axis of Evil”.

More than ever, the struggling freedom loving Iranians are looking for the moral support of the Americans in their global quest to rid the world of this unholy, demonic menace. The Iranian people are in search of a democratic government separate from religious fanaticism, and a free and peaceful society. In pursuit of these goals they ask the American people to join with them in opposition to any reform or reformist movement within the Islamic republic, and to ask of their representative not to embrace or endorse any such sham reform in Iran, as they are nothing but an illusion and they do not represent the Iranian people.

The “Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran” while honoring all those who perished during the horrific September 11 attack and expressing once again its deepest sympathy with the families of the victims, declares that will do what ever is necessary to strengthen the bond and cooperation between the two great nations of Iran and America in the fight and struggle against Global Terrorism and Religious Fanatism.

It’s of this committee’s strongest believe that the Iranian and American peoples will emerge victorious in their noble mission of contributing to a safer and peaceful World!

September 11, 2003 (20th Shahrivar 1382)
The “Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran” (SMCCDI)

Remembrance

At this precise hour and date two years ago an event changed history and seared eternal anger into the American soul. This flash multimedia presentation is the best remembrance I have found to date. It came out shortly after and I have from time to time reminded people of it.

I cannot seem to get to the original web site for it at the moment. For the time being I’ve placed a copy on our server. Make sure you have tissue handy when you watch and listen. If you are an American, you will need them.

On some far star a millennium hence, our descendants will pause and remember this date.

We will never forgive and we will never forget.

Vietnam? I think not.

Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) has claimed the Iraq campaign “is costing like Vietnam”. I’ll leave it up to the reader to compare budget requests for Iraq with the costs of Vietnam. Particularly of interest is the table showing the actual incremental costs: the amount spent on Vietnam over and above the normal defense budget.

Keep in mind a few facts as you think about it. There is a bit of a difference in the value of a dollar between then and now. In 1965 you could still buy a comic book with a silver dime (debased coins had just been released that year). Vietnam lasted a decade and peaked at a half million troops. There were single day’s (certainly single weeks) in which the American death toll exceeded the losses in Iraq to date.

The conditions in Iraq are very different from Vietnam. For it to become “a Vietnam” would require:

  1. a major portion of the Iraqi population deciding on civil war to overthrow or prevent a new government.
  2. the Syrian regular Army operating across the border in support of the civil war.
  3. the growth of jungle in Western Iraq and surrounding areas. (Cover for the enemy, denial of ground for armoured operations)
  4. Russia (or France or China) pouring billions in modern arms and advisors into Syria and threatening nuclear strikes on American cities if the US crosses the border.
  5. the DOD dropping doctrines of integrated operations and use of overwhelming force.
  6. micromanagment of US strategic and tactical operations for purely political reasons.

This all seems very unlikely.

A fairly reasonable people

A scientific opinion poll has been carried out in Iraq for the first time. The results are about what one should expect, given the situation. That is to say, the media image of the situation is pretty bogus. Iraqis by and large want the Coalition to stay just long enough for them to get their country standing on its’ own feet. A large percentage, especially among the majority Shiites, want no part of a religious state. Most Iraqis are fairly positive towards America and Americans but not uncritically so. The population appears to be very secular for that part of the world.

There appears very little danger any of our nightmare scenarios will happen. Baathists will be tried and punished. There seems little desire for amnesty towards the managers of 35 years of brutality in the Iraqi public’s heart. Osama is personna non-gratis by a super-majority. Iran is not their favoured model for their future, not even among the southern Shiites.

Iraq may not end up a democracy; but it will probably not end up a disaster. I think these people will sort themselves out just fine.

In a few years it will be a very friendly place for American and British tourists to visit.

I plan to be one of them.

Memorium for a great physicist

Edward Teller, one of the great intellects of the twentieth century, died on Tuesday at age 95. Fox News has an obituary. It’s not bad although the reporter obviously has a rather negative attitude about Dr. Teller. These lines are some of the best of the article:

In an interview in 2001, Teller showed his old fighting spirit, delivering the two-word endorsement — “High time!” — to President George W. Bush’s decision to pull out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty with Russia to work on a missile defense shield.

“So many times I have been asked whether I regret having worked on the atomic and hydrogen bombs,” he wrote in his autobiography, “Memoirs: A Twentieth-Century Journey in Science and Politics.” “My answer is no. I deeply regret the deaths and injuries that resulted from the atomic bombings, but my best explanation of why I do not regret working on weapons is a question: What if we hadn’t?”

I was my good fortune to attend a lecture by the good doctor some years ago. Teller was an idea factory through his entire life and was a rivetting speaker. I never knew the man personally, but I know people who worked with him in the national labs. He was a forceful leader and did not like obstacles or excuses. The future was there to reach for and he was fully prepared to reach as far as possible.

We owe him a debt of gratitude.

Big Brother wants YOU!

User Friendly has been my daily “must read” cartoon every day since it’s inception. It’s the “Bloom County” of the computer world. If you see a tech guy laughing hysterically and falling off his seat, it means he’s either just wiped the corporate server terrabyte disk and backups by accident or is reading UF.

Like Bloom County, the strips have long standing characters and follow ongoing story lines. The stories often have a connection to the humorous side of current events.

Now to the point and the current events. UF’s Sunday ‘toon takes a pithy look at the true meaning of the RIAA “amnesty” program.

Don’t blame me if you spend the rest of the day and well into the night reading the UF cartoon archives… you have free will. Really.

Winning by being nice… mostly

In some previous discussions on failings of the American forces I received a firestorm of protest. I never backed down on my opinion that annoying decent Iraqi’s and shooting wildly is not a way to win hearts and minds.

I’m rather chuffed the Marines agree with me… and so do the 101st Airborne. Both have done magnificent jobs in their regions. They are largely unsung on the nightly news. Reporters ignore them because success does not fit the discourse they write within.

It is interesting to note the Marines running the Najaf region have not lost a soldier since May. [Note that all casualties are declining].

Marines give the CPA (“Can’t Provide Anything”) low marks, closely followed by the forces around Baghdad. I must admit the central region around Baghdad/Tikrit is where the most bad guys went to ground and is thus inherently more dangerous. The Army hasn’t bolloxed the job but I think the Marines would have done a better one.

So let the inter-service flame war begin!

I found the link at Instapundit and thought it well worth the attention of our readers.

The victim game

Over at Instapundit, Glenn Reynolds has linked to a fascinating paper on Orientalism. The paper, a debunking of Edward Said’s anti-Western/Eastern-victim diatribe, is to be found on the web site of the admirable Institute for the Secularisation of Islam.

Besides duking it out with an icon of the victimology crowd, Ibn Warraq also presents a fascinating history of the interactions of Europe and the Middle East. It is quite long but well worth the read.

Be sure to put the kettle on before you start!