The Research Defence Society, a body supporting animal research in medicine, has started a blog. They intend to use it to keep people up to date with their activities, to counter disinformation and highlight how animal rights extremists use terrorism against scientists, and to support staff involved in animal research.
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Supporting science against the ludditesNovember 15th, 2005 |
 4 comments to Supporting science against the luddites |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
Thanks for this link – I have a number of annoying vegetarian/animal-rights-activist friends and can use a source of info like this.
For my part, I think we shouldn’t needlessly experiment on animals. I myself, for example, favor products that don’t (or claim not to) use animals in testing research – my right as a consumer in a free society.
I also think that a lot of superfluous animal experiments are done (in the US at least) to avoid lawsuits and could be avoided if people would take a more responsible attitude to consumer choice. Any fool could tell you that if your mascara causes your skin to swell up you should switch to another brand – no need to torture rabbits to prove the point.
That said, there is no denying that testing on animals is absolutely necessary to swift progress in other more critical industries – especially the pharmaceutical industry. In such cases – I’m all for it. Human welfare comes first. I’m not ashamed of what idiots like Peter Singer would call my “speciesism.”
The point is, who gets to decide whether an experiment is “necessary” or not? And it’s obvious that’s not a choice best left to governments or “public interest” groups. The Peter Singers of the world would rather see a million men die than for one bunny to get a sore eye in a noble cause.
Quite right – I don’t want the government involved.
I’ll stick to consumer choice and advertising campaigns.
A couple years ago, my wife and I were in San Francisco over the same weekend of the Gay Pride parade, which included a group called Leather Pride – really proud of their leather outfits, I guess. We watched the festivities for a while, then walking back to our hotel, we passed a couple waifs from PETA picketing Neiman Marcus, closed at the time, carrying signs titled Neiman Carcass. I remember thinking: Hey, you missed it! There is a whole mob of people down there flaunting their leather and you’re up here picketing an empty store? I could never figure that out.
Thanks for the link; the video is quite instructive.