We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
Samizdata quote of the day The sort of dependence that results from exchange, i.e., from commercial transactions, is a reciprocal dependence. We cannot be dependent upon a foreigner without his being dependent on us. Now, this is what constitutes the very essence of society. To sever natural interrelations is not to make oneself independent, but to isolate oneself completely.
– Frédéric Bastiat
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
This is not an argument against severing unnatural or unbalanced relations (such as our disproportionate financial contributions to the European Union in return for an avalanche of dirigiste regulations) back to a more sustainable and amenable level.
His argument assumes that all relations are equal.
No; but he does assume they are relations capable of breach. Dependency becomes invisible when it is certain.
Well said, Guy. Bastiat was not talking about state-to-state relationships, which are perverse by their very nature. He was talking about not preventing people from trading with each other regardless of where they are, which is the opposite notion to ‘Britain trades with the EU’… it does nothing of the sort. Individuals and companies trade with individuals and companies and must be allowed to do so unfettered.