We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
Steve Baker is extremely sound on the importance of looking after the most vulnerable in society. I’ve heard him speak on two occasions about it. On one occasion he was booed at the start, as some members of the audience thought he was going to support welfarism. It’s refreshing to hear a politician start from the statement that the most important thing that a society can do is to look after its weakest members, and then go on to explain how socialism doesn’t do that. There are a few others tory MPs who get it, but not enough to even consider joining the party.
I don’t watch much telly, or any telly news, so can anyone tell me if an interview like that, with those sorts of premises would be shown on BBC or ITN or even Sky, rather than Russia Today?
He is properly articulate. As a piece of presentation, that was an impressive performance. It’ll be interesting to see how he does with a Today Programme presenter, although I’m not sure it’d wise even to step into that arena.
He’s apparently a known “very rebellious” backbencher – presumably since he fails to conform, he will never advance to a more prominent role in the Conservative Party. Of course, if he did conform, we would no longer care if he became a front bencher. Such is the nature of politics.
“I don’t watch much telly, or any telly news, so can anyone tell me if an interview like that, with those sorts of premises would be shown on BBC or ITN or even Sky, rather than Russia Today?”
No, well certainly not on the BBC. How sad is that!
Pretty good effort – some obvious editing may have cut-out a few stumbles ? But the bottom line message is good. I guess a key question for us is what practical steps are to be put in place to achieve the rhetorical objectives. But hearing a politician at least articulating this message is refreshing. We need more like this….
The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa
Shhhh…. Don’t tell Dave!
It helps that he was in the RAF and he represents High Wycombe (former HQ of Bomber Command).
Steve Baker is extremely sound on the importance of looking after the most vulnerable in society. I’ve heard him speak on two occasions about it. On one occasion he was booed at the start, as some members of the audience thought he was going to support welfarism. It’s refreshing to hear a politician start from the statement that the most important thing that a society can do is to look after its weakest members, and then go on to explain how socialism doesn’t do that. There are a few others tory MPs who get it, but not enough to even consider joining the party.
If you guys don’t want him…we could use him over here. :>))
I don’t watch much telly, or any telly news, so can anyone tell me if an interview like that, with those sorts of premises would be shown on BBC or ITN or even Sky, rather than Russia Today?
There are quite a few sensible Conservative members of Parliament – sadly I expect “call me Dave” to launch a de facto purge at some point.
Funny, that Julie. We could use him over here, too!
He is properly articulate. As a piece of presentation, that was an impressive performance. It’ll be interesting to see how he does with a Today Programme presenter, although I’m not sure it’d wise even to step into that arena.
He’s apparently a known “very rebellious” backbencher – presumably since he fails to conform, he will never advance to a more prominent role in the Conservative Party. Of course, if he did conform, we would no longer care if he became a front bencher. Such is the nature of politics.
I see what you mean, Liberal Vision. Maybe we could clone him.
In answer to Kevin B:
No, well certainly not on the BBC. How sad is that!
Pretty good effort – some obvious editing may have cut-out a few stumbles ? But the bottom line message is good. I guess a key question for us is what practical steps are to be put in place to achieve the rhetorical objectives. But hearing a politician at least articulating this message is refreshing. We need more like this….