We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
A spot of freelance quantitative easing I will certainly not be the only one now pointing out the similarity between what this gang of counterfeiters got up to, and British government policy. The biggest difference between the two groups of transgressors is in the scale of it. Our government’s currency printing binge will be on a far more grandiose scale.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
The Government clearly does not like competition, especially from the private sector.
Perhaps what is needed is not counterfeit money but a variety of currencies, as Germany(Link) has, and as Hayek suggested.(Link)
Yes, the counterfeiters are just “stimulating the economy” and running a fractional reserve bank with a reserve rate of zero. Which has the benefit of preventing bank runs. 😉
Keynesianism, Obama, and maybe some of your British politicians, say that if you give people $1,000 they will spend it and “create” $1,500. I say, just give me the thousand, and I don’t care what other people do with it. Isn’t that closer to the spending (I mean fiscal) policies of the government?
When an idea leads directly to a crazy result, what should we think about that idea? Maybe laugh at it until the proponent explains in detail how it works. If you believe Obama, Keynes, and their proclaimed multiplier of 1.5 on government spending, then it would be valuable to counterfeit as much money as possible, of course under government regulation. You don’t have to borrow counterfeit money, or pay it back. It is ideal for Keynesian government projects.
Let’s Counterfeit Our Way to Wealth
Well, there was a spoof article here(Link).
No strikethroughs this time, for the humour bypassed.