They have their rules, and I have mine.
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
8 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
…and any resemblance between the two is purely coincidental.
“There are no rules in politics”.
Tony Blair
Rule 1: if you choose to do things of doubtful merit, it’s better not to be found out.
Best regards
“There are no rules in Politics”-Bliar.
Politics consists of rules and nothing else. ‘Rules’ is a virtual synonym for politics.
For Bliar to say that is essentially a statement of intent to destabilise the world and turn it upside down.
For Bliar to say that, is just another example of his essential technique-namely trying to paralyse the intellect by means of tautological paradox just long enough to commit a crime which can then be consigned to the past almost immediately by progressive fervour.
He should be led to Tyburn in his underwear and hung up by the feet like Mussolini.
Blair will be missed — he is a brilliant man with character and intellect, quite unlike the current leader of the US, regrettably. I doubt very much if the next leader of the UK will be nearly as interesting as Blair.
Politics is as much about power as rules — I’d like to see a successful politican that hasn’t had to make significant compromises in order to succeed.
Sorry, was that `Brent’ as in `Brent crude’?
Blair a brilliant man with character and intellect? I think not. Intellect possibily, character most definitely not. Unless you mean character as in `of bad character’.
Unprincipled, power-hungry, demagogue sounds more like it.
David Brent?
And they have predator drones, and I have a six-shooter.