I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned.
– Richard Feynman
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata quote of the dayI would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned. – Richard Feynman February 23rd, 2022 |
12 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
Feynman was one of the most interesting physicists ever. Not only was he a safecracker, he played a mean frying pan. Among a myriad of things, including being a font of wise sayings.
+10
Feynman had one of the beautiful and insightful minds I’ve ever encountered. A small but wonderful taste of it can be found in a short video where he explains how trees are made of sunlight and CO2. With a great weight on evidence not theory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifk6iuLQk28
More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNhlNSLQAFE
The OP quote is one for all time – but particularly needed at this present time.
Here is another Feynman quote of which the same is true:
The second buttresses the first. The ignorance of the experts is reason enough why free speech must apply even to answers from experts. And vice versa – experts who think their answers must not be questioned may be experts on how the science bureaucracy works but are very ignorant of how science works.
“experts on how the science bureaucracy works but are very ignorant of how science works”
Yes, key point. Bit like “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach.” Or in this case dictate.
On re-reading Feynman’s Surely You Are Joking, shortly before ‘covid’ became a household word, I realized how un-PC (now: un-woke) it is. Almost as much as Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew 🙂 which however goes a bit too far in my opinion.
(I had read Feynman’s book when it first came out, but at the time i did not even know what ‘PC’ means iirc.)
My favourite Feynman quote: “It doesn’t matter how important you are, or how elegant your theory is – if it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong”.
Present-day applications will occur to the reader, no doubt.
But everyone wearing masks make me feel saffeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!
/s
And one Feynman quote that might have been especially for the SAGE Nudge Unit…
But do I fear they would have taken that as an instruction.
These days Richard Feynman would not be allowed in a university – unless it was to clean the toilets.
All subjects, including the physical sciences (for example the “Climate Change Emergency”) have “correct” answers – and if anyone questions those answers, then they are punished. There is no real discussion of evidence and ideas – just savage attacks and punishment.
As soon as a young student version of Richard Feynman started to question things (for example if a man really could have a baby) he would be attacked and punished – he would either learn NOT to question things, or would be forced out of university.
“But what if he was a famous academic?”
That would not help him, not at all. As soon as he (for example) made a “racist” statement – he would be “cancelled”.
We used to live in a fairly free society (far from perfect – but with a good measure of Freedom of Speech) we NO LONGER DO.
Such things as science can not flourish in modern “Woke” (Frankfurt School Marxist) society – and so are dying.
Compare and contrast:
“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” — Richard Feynman
Vs.
“The strain of [American] anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge’.” — Issac Asimov
Compare and contrast the genuine nobel-quality scientist with the fan of science.
(Full disclosure: when I was in primary school, I read Asimov’s SF pretty well as avidly as Heinlein’s, though I could sense even then a certain rigidity of mind about how societies and cultures work in Asimov versus Heinlein.)
Here’s an even better version of Feynman’s “Trees Come Out Of the Air”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60WTUwlvEk0
Or trees are made of sunlight.