I never argue. It’s other people who argue with me.
– Roger Hewland, proprietor of Gramex, Lower Marsh, London. Overheard by me, this afternoon.
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata quote of the dayI never argue. It’s other people who argue with me. – Roger Hewland, proprietor of Gramex, Lower Marsh, London. Overheard by me, this afternoon. November 21st, 2012 |
3 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
Although I am sure Mr Hewland has no desire to conquer Europe, the logical structure of this quote could not help reminding me of Clauswitz on Bonaparte:
“The aggressor is always peace-loving (as Bonaparte always claimed to be); he would prefer to take over our country unopposed.”
He’s more the sort who wants Europe to conquer him.
More seriously, it’s a way to argue that I have in the past recommended. You simply state a position, as yours. Others who don’t like you disagreeing with them then find themselves wanting to persuade you that you’re wrong.
Reversing the burden of proof.
All my life I’ve run into so many people who have such eccentric ideas. I don’t understand it at all.
Why are’nt they just normal and ordinary, like me?