America currently has the worst political class in its history. But if Europe doesn’t, it’s only because of how very bad it’s been in the past.
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata quote of the dayAmerica currently has the worst political class in its history. But if Europe doesn’t, it’s only because of how very bad it’s been in the past. June 23rd, 2012 |
6 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
‘Worst political class’ is an oxymoron to begin with: politics and politicians are not necessarily bad (although I’d happily do without either), but there’s no way a political class can be good. If that can be taken as a premise, along with the notion that the US political class is the mere extension/continuation/duplication of the European one, then what does it do to Glenn’s point?:-)
Politicians are pretty much all bad, by their very nature.
You only have to look at their absurd wages and massive pensions (MPs and Senators line their own pockets with taxpayers money, voting themselves obscene perks, while receiving massive bungs from lobbyists).
They pretend to be public servants in order to line their own fat pockets. I don’t give a toss what a politician says, I look at the list of his/her donors, because that’s their manifesto; whatever their donors tell them to do.
Politics is, especially these days, just a stepping stone to cushy jobs at JP Morgan. They are all in it for themselves and their donors.
If you want a politician to listen to you, you must first buy them. To be fair, as whores go they are relatively cheap. My apologies to whores for associating them with politicians.
Politicians are great if you own some of them, if you don’t you might as well not vote.
At least with a whore I know that it is me that will be doing the screwing (rather than being screwed) and I also get to chose the whore, the price and the services.
With the political process I get none of these things.
Shame on you for bringing the noble profession of whoring into such disrepute by comparing it to politics.
As usual, Mendicant stands ready to confuse the issue – but hey, that’s what trolls do.
The point is not whether politicians tend to be good or bad people, but whether they can serve a good purpose – and occasionally they do, if some kind of political system is a given reality. The distinction I am trying to convey is that ‘politicians’ are not necessarily the same thing as ‘political class’. Furthermore, the existence of politicians does not necessarily imply the existence of a political class – but given enough time of the former, the latter is probably likely emerge. We are obviously way past that point in time, both in the US and in Europe.
…’to emerge’…
Alisa beat me to the punch.