Remarkable developments are in train at London’s Royal Court Theatre, in the form of a play that is about climate science, but is not Watermelon propaganda. In a guest posting at Bishop Hill, Mr and Mrs Josh (Mr Josh also does the cartoons at Bishop Hill) provide a fascinating and enticing review of The Heretic, a new play by Richard Bean:
Book your tickets now, this play is a must-see comedy.
It has everything – more accurate climate science than a BBC documentary (ok, that’s not exactly hard), brilliantly funny and wonderfully staged.
The drama centres on university climate scientist, Dr Diane Cassell, played superbly by Juliet Stevenson, whose research on sea levels in the Maldives shows no rising trend in sea levels.
This puts her at odds with Professor Kevin Maloney, Head of Dept Earth Sciences, played by James Fleet (sinisterly morphed from Hugo, in the Vicar of Dibley) whose main aim is to attract more funding to the department by toeing the consensus line on Climate Change.
When she publishes her research and expresses her skeptical views, notably on Newsnight to Jeremy Paxman, she becomes the focus of some very direct persecution.
Add in Phoebe, her daughter, and Ben, her carbon-obsessed first-year student, plus an ex-marine security guard and the stage is set. Pure comedy ensues as Ben follows the logic of his beliefs, refusing to keep warm, travel in any petroleum-based transport, and considering suicide since his vegetarian diet causes excessive methane production. Phoebe is ahead of him; severely anorexic she is at real risk of not making it. Both characters are played with worrying fragility that conveys lives overshadowed by fear, battling to understand the issues or find a set of rules to live by. Their plight is all too similar to that of Diane, struggling to work out if the death threats from environmentalists should be taken seriously.
In a feat of Montfordian proportions nearly all the major recent climate change stories are woven into the play: the lack of sea level rise, the politicisation of science by the IPCC, Glaciergate, the logarithmic effect of CO2 (in a way you will never forget), the misanthropy of some environmentalist groups, the ‘one-tree’ hockey stick, and, of course, Climategate. But the issues are put on the table, without arm twisting, encouraging the audience to go out and do their own research.
Maybe I am reading far too much into this, but this sounds like it could be something of a cultural turning point in Britain. For decades now, there has been a self-reinforcing feedback loop shutting out anything but left wing friendly dramas from the live theatre in Britain, or so it has seemed and felt to one of those who has felt shut out. No anti-lefty dramas – e.g. praising Thatcher or heroic entrepreneurs or working class vigilantes, or denouncing bossy social workers or manipulative communists or ridiculous civil servants or psychotic and tyrannical Islamists, or pointing at the state itself as the prime mover in the banking crisis – have made sense to the theatres, because the audience for such things hasn’t been there, and because writers have been disinclined even to bother writing such things. What’s the point? And because there is no non-lefty drama, the audience for such things never comes. It stays at home surfing the net or watching its preferred telly shows and movies. If it is like me, it blogs.
Crucial to the willingness of another audience to show up to see this play is that it can be urged to do so on the internet, despite the major official organs of British theatre publicity, notable the BBC and the Guardian, apparently trying, just as they have tried with Climategate itself, to be very sniffy and dismissive. If a new audience does show up in strength at the Royal Court to see The Heretic, then that could result in Britain’s theatres saying: hey, I wonder if there are other non-lefty-friendly “issues” out there that we haven’t done before, because the BBC and the Guardian haven’t allowed us to?
Never forget that theatre folk love a big row, provided only that the row isn’t too big, as it would be if they took at serious whack at Islam. They love to push the boundaries, not too far, but just that little bit beyond what is entirely safe. They love to make mischief, to get everyone shouting at each other. They love to take the piss out of whoever happens at any particular moment to be the pompous and hypocritical elite, because, potentially, maybe, that will sell tickets, contrive bums on seats. Okay, most British thesps are lefties themselves, but many of those lefties are theatricals first, lefties second, and in quite a few other cases, on the quiet, so I surmise, not actually proper lefties at all, really, even though they dress like lefties and talk like lefties.
A earlier key moment in British theatrical history happened in the late nineteen fifties. British live theatre was then the Conservative Party at play, watching third-rate Noel Coward imitations consisting of brittle, well-dressed upper middle class chat in implausibly opulent living rooms with big floor-to-ceiling French windows at the back, centre stage. That is a caricature but not that much of one. But suddenly, or so it felt, all that was smashed to pieces by John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger, and all that followed from it. Look Back in Anger was also, by the way, first presented at the Royal Court. Perhaps my view of all that is a bit myopic, because the nearest theatre to my home when I was a kid was the Windsor Rep, which, I seem to recall, showed third-rate Noel Coward imitations just about all the time. But I suspect I have it about right, even if those closer to theatrical happenings then had felt in their water that the Angry Young Man upheaval had been coming for some time and thus remember it as a somewhat more gradual thing. I’m not saying that The Heretic is in the same class, as a play or as a culturally explosive event, as Look Back in Anger. I haven’t seen The Heretic yet. But this new play may perhaps, with hindsight, come be seen as one of the bigger paving stones that paved the way for something that is more like Look Back in Anger.
Goodness knows, Britain certainly contains plenty of anger just now.
Conveniently for me, the Royal Court Theatre is in Sloane Square, which is only a longish walk or a short bus or tube ride from where I live. I’m giving a talk on Monday. As soon as that’s out of the way, I will pop around to the Royal Court and fix to see The Heretic for myself.
To paraphrase LBJ,
Next, Climategate, The Musical (sorry, couldn’t resist).
I won’t be able to see it in August, will I?
Very on target. Funnily enough, I read a review of the play in the Evening Standard and thought, “That would make a nice item for the blog”. But you wrote it much better.
Perhaps we should get a group together and go and see it.
Just booked a ticket. Thanks.
Interesting development, and it might in fact represent a turning point. It’s important to note that this is a comedy; it’s probably far too early in the game for a tendentious drama. Keep it light. Remember Saul Alinsky’s 5th Rule: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”
The comedy angle is interesting. I think if this play had been put on in the sort of theatre that otherwise shows farces along the lines of those written by Ray Cooney, it could easily be shrugged off by the guardians of lefty groupthink as a reactionary frippery, to entertain old fogeys and then be utterly forgotten.
But a play like this at the Royal Court! That is a real affront to respectably stupid opinion. This is a stab into the heart of the lefty intellectual empire. Traitors!
It makes me wonder what other plays the Royal Court has been putting on recently.
Does this mean part of the theatre is turning against the left, or that part of the left is turning against the warmists? The latter seems much more likely.
AMcguinn: is there a substantial difference?
Sorry AMcguinn, I seem to have misread your comment…
AMcguinn
Many of the best anti-leftists start out as dissenters on one leftist issue, who at first insist that they are still broadly on the left. But then, they get so badly mauled by undissenting leftists (i.e. called a mad right wing bastard in the pay of Satan blah blah), and so well-treated by anti-leftists, that they migrate, almost despite themselves.
Robert Conquest, who wrote that great work on Stalin’s terror, is an example that springs to mind. He used to be a communist, and I read recently that he is suspected by some of having been quite serious about it. Other commenters can surely think of many other “objectively anti-left” leftists stroke ex-leftists of this sort.
Such migrators bring with them a deep knowledge of the leftist mind-set, because that used to be them.
Also, whatever a little group of one-issue-dissenting leftists may think they are doing (in this case perhaps, just giving a fair crack of the whip to climate science sceptics, because that way you at least get a genuine clash of ideas built into the drama), if these particular leftists set in motion a process which brings in a new definitely non- or anti-left audience, that may have unforeseen consequences, whatever may have been intended. Before you know it, genuine anti-leftists may be writing good plays, submitting them, and getting them performed, because a new audience has been cultivated.
Well, maybe. This is mostly conjecture on my part. But it is not unreasonable to hope that something like this could happen, and maybe already is happening.
Laird,
I prefer that sentiment as “The devil, that proude spirit, cannot bear to be mocked”.
Let us have a comedy series on TV on this topic. The Vicar of Dibley was mentioned which had just a few episodes. In my mind is John Cleese and the Ministry of Silly Walks, or Fawlty Towers with the Germans staying at the hotel.
I don’t know much (read: don’t know anything) about the Theatre or luvvies, but I definitely get the impression the warmists are rocking towards the back foot at last.
Except in die-hard Guardianista circles, people now listen when I make the counter-arguments, rather than going straight into default sneer mode.
Keep pushing, everyone.
I can honestly say I don’t know anyone in my day to day life who believes in warming: they either don’t care, or think it’s all a load ofrot.