Why do communists only drink herbal tea?
…
Because proper tea is theft.
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata groaner of the dayOctober 24th, 2010 |
19 comments to Samizdata groaner of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
tea hea
Lord forgive him and save all the starving pygmies in New Guinea, amen.
While the libertarian asks, “are you fu’coffee?”
Excellent! And the comments, too!
How many social workers does it take to change a light bulb?
Only one, but the light-bulb must really, really, want to change!
How many politicians does it take to change a light bulb?
None- they love keeping us in the dark and feeding us bull-!
A dreadful pun, which might have been bearable if Proudhon had been a commuunist.
i’m afraid that joke doesn’t really work. It was Proudhon who said property is theft. He also said ‘property is liberty’. Proudhon was an Anarchist; Marx disagreed with him fundamentally and disagreed with him. Nought out of ten.
It wroks fine. Proudhon was nothing but gibberish and you have no concept of humor (and logically this version makes more coherent sense as it really is communism, not genuine (ie libertarian propertarian) anarchism that negates property)
How do I get Lapsang Souchong out of a keyboard?
You don’t.
If you’re drinking stuff like that, you retreat to your dacha, and leave the cleanup for the baboushka who cleans your office.
I am amazed that this was categorized under “Humour” — on the other hand, I don’t see a category called “Emetic”.
Oh, and stand by for the greatest joke ever devised:
Q. How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. THAT’S NOT FUNNY!!!!
How many Manchester United fans does it take to change a lightbulb?
only one, but you’ve got to bus him in from SE Asia
This is an oldie but goldie :
How many Marxists does it take to change a lightbulb?
None. The lightbulb contains the seeds of its own revolution.
How many policemen does it take to change a light bulb?
Just leave one policeman alone with that light bulb for one hour, and it will have changed its’ mind and ‘voluntarily’ signed the confession!
How many Teamsters does it take to change a lightbulb?
Seven at Time & a Half! You got a problem with that?
How many Christian Scientists does it take to change a light bulb?
Just one – to sit and pray for the old one to come on again.
Q. How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?
A. That’s not funny. But it is actionable.
How many computer programmers does it take to change a lightbulb? They can’t do that, it’s a hardware problem.