America has “Czars” because there are still a few respectable people using the titles of “Capo” and “Don”
– Commenter CJF
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata quote of the dayAmerica has “Czars” because there are still a few respectable people using the titles of “Capo” and “Don” – Commenter CJF September 4th, 2009 |
11 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
We accept the use of such titles (promulgated by our much-beloved media) to recognize the formaliztion of hierarchies of our expanding bureaucracies.
I don’t have a problem with these folk using the term Czar, invoking imperial Rome, so long as we are afforded the same courtesy when we show our displeasure with them – dragging their corpses with hooks to the Potomac.
Barack Obama is angry with Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and others who call his unaccountable (and unconstitutional) high “advisers” (with their unknown budgets and powers) “Czars” (“just because I have more of these officers than any other President…..”)
And I agree with Barack Obama – they are not Czars. Given their position (outside the legal structure but powerful – with no clear limits) and their political opinions (not just of Van Jones but of most of the 33 of them) and Obama’s own political opinions……..
The title “Commissar” is more fitting.
The czars are just a scam to avoid public scrutiny and Senate confirmation. That way Obama can have any ex-convict, crook and liar he wants and Congress can’t do anything about it.
For the most part it is an unconstitutional usurpation of power.
Note how our ACLU responds … chirp chirp
People power …
Brad, Czar is of Slavic etymology: czar is the Slavic word for king. Hence, Paul Marks gets a beer – kommissar (Slavic for commissioner) is the better term. It is from a more relevant historic period, and there never were multiple czars, but there were quite a few all-but-omnipotent kommissars.
Plamus, ‘czar’ is the Slavic version of the Greek and then Gothic versions of the Latin word ‘Caesar’, but Paul gets a beer nonetheless:-)
I agree that Paul gets a beer. However, in keeping with the Russian theme might I suggest that we agree to adopt the spelling “Kommissar” (using a “k” rather than a “c”)?
A beer for Laird, too. Oh, what the heck, a beer for everyone:-)
A czar in every garage.
I am happy to give Paul a beer any time he asks for one. I would rather give him a column in a national newspaper, but alas, that is not in my power.
Indeed.