The arrest of Damian Green is quite appalling and so ridiculously Orwellian that I am almost tempted to vote Tory. I mean it.
– a commenter here
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata quote of the dayThe arrest of Damian Green is quite appalling and so ridiculously Orwellian that I am almost tempted to vote Tory. I mean it. – a commenter here November 30th, 2008 |
5 comments to Samizdata quote of the day |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
I went to my local shop and had a look at the front pages of the Sunday papers this morning. This story was all over the front pages of the Telegraph and Mail on Sunday, but nowhere to be seen on the Observer, Sunday Times, or Sunday Independent. Yes, there is another big story today, and if one of these papers have devoted the entire front page to events in Mumbai, I would understand, but there were other stories on the front pages.
Credit is due to the Telegraph and the Mail, and I am aware that the story is covered in ways not friendly to the government in some places inside some of these papers (where are more people like Nick Cohen who are of the left but none the less understand what freedom is?) but the differences seem to indicate that that this story is just seen by the editors of all papers as a partisan matter. The story that indicates pretty much unequivocally that Britain is now a police state is seen as nothing more than partisan politics by our newspapers.
This is a disgrace.
however the Observer and other left-wing papers did criticise the arrest, and lots of left-wing commentators have been outraged.
Now we are beginning to see some damage-limitation strategy by the Government. Asserting the police are just doing their job and no one in the Government knew has failed. Attacking Green would plainly be counterproductive. So now we see the character of the man accused of leaking being impugned to shore up the Labour tribal base.
Here is Alan Travis printing the new line:
The man, even though a civil servant, was a tory who had tried to get a job working for the Conservative party; we are invited to conclude that he was therefore not in any sense a whistleblower (unlike those upright representatives of moral authority Sarah Tisdall and Clive Ponting, whom the wicked Thatcher regime persercuted), but evilly motivated by party interest, and the desire to curry favour for personal advancement.
Note those passive tenses: “It was reported today”, “it was claimed today”. Claimed and reported by whom? Sources close to the Home Secretary or the Metropolitan Police, perhaps?
I think this is rather a telling quote, really. The number of lefties and leftoids I have met who, after a long rant about Blair, Brown and the rest of the bloodsuckers will then say, “But I could never vote Tory”.
If they could just be persuaded, just this once, if not to vote Tory, at least not to vote for the government, come the next election, that would be some small victory. They don’t have to pledge undying allegiance or anything.
Here’s one lifelong Labour voter (though not in 05) who will be voting Conservative next time.
My local MP is a Tory in a safe seat but his voting record is far to the left of most Labour MPs.
I have to say I started to get worried back in 2000 when the government brought in the RIP Act. I was appalled at the time not just by the fact that this was not being reported widely in the press but also that the people I was telling about it were sublimely complacent. As are many when I tell them about the EU communications directive on logging our phone calls and internet activity.
I don’t recall Orwell actually specifying the political colour of Big Brother’s regime so perhaps voting Tory is a case of jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. I’ll stick with the Greens (how appropriate) thanks.