OK, I am biassed. NO2ID gets a credit on this film. But having been to a contributors’ screening last night, I think you could do worse than drag any friends or relations who are complacent about Britain being ‘a free country’ along to Taking Liberties (since 1997) when it opens on June 8th. If you have a black sense of humour, you will laugh.
Not much in the film will come as news to Samizdata readers, and to get anything like a coherent story out of so much material it has had to simplify, rather. But I was very pleasantly surprised that in doing so it avoids falling into the usual human-rightist traps of equating liberty with leftism. Teeters on the edge occasionally, perhaps. The sequence on Guantanamo is a little too long, and I think unbalances the section on the Blair regime’s complicity in torture. But there are few tendentious statements, and in most ways it is a conservative polemic. If there are heroes on screen they are mild-mannered middle-class pacifists. The off-screen heroes are Winston Churchill and the common law courts.
The points are made gently and methodically, ticking off, one by one, the broad civil liberties supposedly assured by the Human Rights Act, but actually removed by the same government that made such a fanfare of its respect for “our way of life”. Boiling the story down from a vast mass of information they could have included makes it very solidly founded. This is polemic, but the antithesis of Michael-Moore-style, concocted illustration of an artificial thesis. I spotted only very few factual errors, and I am an awful nitpicking wonk, as you all know.
What will stay with me, however, is what I had not seen before. Footage of lots of officious political policing and show of official force. Those who think we are softies whining about nothing will no doubt say that actually this just illustrates we are in no danger, Britain is still a healthy democracy (whatever that means). But is it really better to be smothered with a feather pillow than publicly garotted?
PS – Like a lot of small films this starts out in a few screens and hopes for a rolling release, so it is desperately sensitive to opening receipts. If you do go to see it when it opens, you increase the chance that others will get a chance do so too.
Perhaps copies should be provided free to every school.
Best regards
Yeah like that’s going to happen, I would love to see this film at my local art cinema (the Odious wouldn’t touch it) but failing that I’ll gladly pay for a download.
I’m sure your local arthouse welcomes suggestions, mandrill
I’d agree with Mandrill – a paid for download would get the film to a much wider audience.
sounds like one to miss then. the film maker is clearly a leftist
ragingnick,
I assume you never go in a bookshop in case all those leftist writers and publishers get you.
There is a distinction between a film-maker and a producer that may be eluding you; and a further one between the views of the creator and the value of the work.
If you are only going to listen to people who pass a purity test, then you are easy meat for manipulation by anyone claiming the politically correct authority. If you are among those who feel that only people who agree with them ought to have liberty, then any film about civil liberties is not really for you.
In endorsing this film, I’m not saying that I agree with all the beliefs of everyone who features in it.
I don’t agree with most of them. One group of protestors that appears has particularly irritated me in the past with its self-righteous inability to see other people might have other points of view. One of the lawyers shown is famous for theories that I think are nonsense on stilts.
But people are entitled to be wrong. The political use of state power to punish dissent, to bully – and worse – those who are minor violators of norms or arbitrarily deemed “bad”, affects everyone who is not determined to be a fawning follower of authority wherever authority should lead.