We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
A bit of gunboat diplomacy? The author of an article I read this morning wonders if the approach of the USS Nimitz Forced Iran’s Decision to release the British hostages. It is an interesting read but I can personally neither confirm nor deny the truth of it.
I do not think the regime in Iran is going to have a long life. Between their economic problems and falling birth rates they have serious problems, ones which a theocracy with delusions of grandeur will simply not be able to deal with.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
Here’s an interesting view from StrategyPage.com, who see it as a defeat for Ahmadinejad in the power struggles between factions within the Iranian regime.
Hasn’t the falling birth rate been something the Iranian regime has been in favour of since around 1986?
http://www.iussp.org/Brazil2001/s20/S20_P01_Abbasi.pdf
Shooting themselves in the foot, perhaps?
I disagree with both. It’s not another Carrier that makes change and Cuba or Zimbabwe thugs are still going.
Since there isnt know a massive emigration of Iranians i think the end of Islamic Regime is just wishfull thinking. Only a War or a couple decades can change that.
According to articles in The Guardian and CounterPunch a deal was done with Iran, the sailors were released in exchange for Iranian diplomats held by the Americans.
Give Iran credit for knowing to quit when they were ahead. They got a “sort of” apology, they got to be the magnanimous good guys, they got to distract the world from their nuke program for a few weeks, they got to humiliate Tony Blair (the mini-Satan) and they have hours and hours of video footage to play with and release when the mood strikes them. Oh and they got or will got their “diplomats” out of Iraq.
Well, like someone else mentioned, it looks like they are just shooting themselves in the foot.
With all the useful idiots we have over here, like the Pelosi-Lantos dog and pony show in Syria, I think the mullahcracy will long out last democracy in the West.
I even read an article by Wahid Phares that there is an extensive Western clique that planned and advised the Iranian regime on the sailor circus. Originally planned to drag into Christmas, they advised to bail out when the captive sailors were not getting the desired sympathy for Iran in western media.
Even if they are on the way to the dustbin of history, the real question once they get nuclear weapons is how many of the rest of us will they take with them into oblivion?