The biblical notion of ‘an eye for an eye’ is still taken seriously in Saudi Arabia. Literally.
|
|||||
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
An eye for an eye.The biblical notion of ‘an eye for an eye’ is still taken seriously in Saudi Arabia. Literally. December 6th, 2005 |
2 comments to An eye for an eye. |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
This being Saudi Arabia, lex talionis is in practice assymetrical. Had the case been the other way round, and a Saudi man blinded an Indian guest-worker in a fight, the case would be unlikely to come to court (or at least not with the Saudi as defendant), and the chances of such savage retaliation being ordered would be vanishingly small.
Given that we are talking about Saudi Arabia, I’m not sure ‘biblical’ is the proper adjective…