This was too good to pass on… while browsing the Telegraph pages and stumbling across their Review of 2004, I must have caught one of the billion monkeys at work!
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
David Blunkett – a festive orangutan?December 26th, 2004 |
 9 comments to David Blunkett – a festive orangutan? |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
I will not carry an ID card. This may mean that I follow Perry out of the city that I happen to love, but I will not carry an ID card.
(Just as a sad fact though, I am about to be fingerprinted for the first time in my life. For my job in equities research, it is necessary that I be licensed by the regulatory bodies of both the UK and US financial markets, and in order to be licensed in the US the Securities and Exchange Commission requires that I submit my fingerprints to them, which they will then apparently submit to the FBI. So it is in fact an American government organisation who are going to be the first to treat me like a common criminal in this way. This does make me wonder where precisely I am going to go if I leave London).
Ha ha ha ha ha! I hope the orang utan doesn’t sue!
Michael, I agree totally with what you say, but why on this post? Too much mulled wine?
Ook?
Ook!
Gabriel: As it happened I had just been browsing the FAQ on the No2id site here, and I came back seething with rage to such an extent that any mention of David Blunkett was enough to set me off.
Michael,
Surely the recent history of the Equities ‘industry’ , both here and in the US, more than warrants the general label of ‘Suspect’, if not ‘Downright Criminal’. Therefore justifiying the fingerprinting and whatever else ‘they’ can think of to deter future skulduggery.
After the disasters of the past couple of years, it is fair to assume that no-one connected with that industry is above suspicion, from brokers and dealers, to CEO’s, pundits, advisors and commentators, I am sure you know that old saying about not playing in the cesspit, if you do not want to smell like s…!
I am sure you smell like roses, but you get my gist…
Rather reinforces the point I have been making all along that those who think the Americans don’t or won’t do this kind of thing as well are deluding themselves, doesn’t it?
EG
No, it doesn’t. The fight at least goes on there, whereas in Britain, the fight is over and the bad guys have won. It is the people who cannot see that who are deluding themselves.
Well actually it does. America, last bastion of liberty and individualism, defender of the private person against the unlimited state, exemplar to all of us Europeans who let the government walk all over us – America is going to biometrically identify and track individuals who have done nothing wrong *before* those nasty horrible British statists. Hmm.
The uncharitable might argue that this is not least due to the facts that (a) the “good guys” give up and run away as soon as it gets difficult, and (b) certain of the “good guys” urge people to vote for parties which might change things but refuse personally to vote for anyone or participate in any way in the democratic process, and then wonder why it all goes bad.
Not, of course, that I am sufficiently uncharitable to share such an opinion, but one can see a certain logic in it…
EG