We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
A cup of Big Brother, er… tea? The Royal Society of Chemistry is to honour author and critic of scientists George Orwell with a search for the perfect way to make his favourite drink.
Orwell was an expert not only on the Big Brother but also on tea – another important aspect of the British society. His 1946 essay A Nice Cup of Tea laid down 11 steps to the perfect brew, and was a reaction to a lack of guidance on tea-brewing in cook books: “This is curious not only because tea is one of the mainstays of civilisation in this country.., but because the best manner of making it is the subject of violent disputes.”
According to Orwell tea should be drunk strong, without sugar and from a cup with a round bottom. It should be poured before adding milk, he insisted, entering a debate that has caused acute controversy within the tea-etiquette world.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bnielsen/teaorwell.html
One of the essays in The Salmon of Doubt is Douglas Adams’ instructions for brewing the best possible cup of tea. Clearly here was another Englishman for whom a good cup of tea was very important. (Adams belonged to the “milk first” side of the argument, however. He stated that while it was socially incorrect to put the milk in first, doing so made for a better cup of tea).
I was told that the ‘milk first’ school of thought developed for a very practical reason, especially relevant in India. Pouring the milk first it was easier to determine whether it is still fresh or has gone sour without wasting a good cupful of that splendid beverage – tea. No fridges and hot climate in India would indeed increase the chances of milk going off quickly.
(warm) milk first also protects very delicate china, by instantly lowering the temperature of the tea being poured in.
‘Milk First’ results in a more creamy taste… splendid!
Not that I ever expected this discussion to come up here, but I’ll take advantage nonetheless. I’ve been wondering: We have two grades of cream here in the U.S. — heavy and light (aka table). I use heavy in my tea for maximum creaminess (also to make butter from once in a while). What, if any, is the general practice in the U.K. — whole (full-fat) milk, light cream, or heavy cream?
Cream in your tea!?! Never! Whole milk or semi-skimmed, if you please.
Douglas Adams’ explanation for putting the milk in first is that if you do this, you initially have a small amount of (hot) tea in contact with a larger amount of (cold) milk: the effect is to cool the tea more rapidly than the milk is heated. If you do it the other way round, you have a large amount of (hot) tea in contact with a smaller amount of (cold) milk. The effect is to heat some of the milk to boiling temperature or close to it and you end up with partially scalded milk in the tea. There is a certain amount of logic in this.
Adriana, I can’t imagine using semi-skimmed (our “2 percent”, I guess), but I’ll try whole milk and see what happens.
BTW, science has apparently come down in favor of milk first. I hate denaturated proteins.
I covered this a while back.
The MIF battle is less important than that between the ‘nice cuppa’ brigade (lead by Orwell) and the teasthetes (DNA being an example).
Nothing like a discussion on the trivial matter of tea making to excite us English. Lough out loud comment on the Guardian site today where they’re having the same discussion:
‘You can make tea any way you want, although only people who greedily suck the cum from Satan’s cock while taking it up the bum from Alsation dogs put the milk in first.’
The Group Captain will not be amused.
Are you absolutely sure he recommended a cup with a round bottom? Surely such a cup would present insurmountable practical difficulties when the time came to put it down?
Martin
Martin Adamson: From Orwell’s essay on making tea –
Eightly, one should drink out of a good breakfast cup – that is, the cylindrical type of cup, not the flat, shallow type. The breakfast cup holds more, and with the other kind one’s tea is always half cold before one has well started on it.