We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
Wackos continue acquisitions An investor of a company well known to us is being sued: the classic tactics of a certain over the edge group. Read this. Make sure you save a personal copy of the page.
Need I say more?
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
Yes, you do need to say more. I for one do not care a rats ass about the big bad Scientologists…. Oooooo, I used the ‘S’ word! Any group who uses the state to restrict free speech that is critical of them can expect nothing polite from me. Oh, and I think L. Ron Hubbard’s writting compares very unfavourably to Enid Blyton. Bite me.
In the interests of getting sued myself, I think the Scientologists need to grow up and learn that people have the right to criticize you (especially when you live in a moronic fantasy world filled with 50b year old aliens who dominate earthlings with evil engrams). This sort of oppression bothers me a great deal. Screw the scientologists. Oh, and Battlefield Earth really sucked. What the hell is wrong with these wack-jobs?
Hear hear. Mad bastards. Or to put it another way:
“No! I’m Spartacus!”
Spartacus? HAH! You wouldn’t know a slave revolt if you were in one. No, I’M Spartacus!
Seriously though, didn’t the Home Office ban these people from operating in the UK back in the seventies?
Before this Spartacus stuff gets totally out of control (and I would love it if it did) let’s get the thing right. We want name recognifition for the original wrong lady as well, so the cry is:
“I’m Diana Hsieh! I’m Spartacus!”
And it only really makes sense if you preface it with a small but well crafted insult of the idiot Scientologists. There has to be a “so sue me” feel about it.
Once (if) it gets going, we can dispense with Spartacus. Everyone will get the reference anyway.
Islamic Iran has sentenced an man who dared question the prophet to death.
The scientologists sue anyone who questions them or their methods to death.
Perhaps the Prez should add the scientologists to the axis of evil.