Natalie Solent links (Monday May 20) to a Guardian piece about blogging. That “fact checking your ass” meme is never going to die is it? They mention Glenn Reynolds of Instpundit by name and by blog. Do they know his meta-context?
I’m sure mostly they do. I’ve always rated the (what it now, just about, still, makes sense to call) “left” at least as good a bet in the long run for libertarianism as the (ditto) “right”. Most Guardian-readers love idea-based radicalism (making trouble for the high and mighty, such as many current Guardian-writers) more than they love socialism, if forced to choose. Many British (at any rate) onservatives, if forced to choose, love the high and mighty more than they love trouble-making (i.e. idea-based radicalism). (This is one of the meta-contextual reasons for the spat between the Libertarian Alliance and the Daily Telegraph. The LA suspects betrayal as the old establishment welcomes the new. The Daily Telegraph regards the LA as politically insignificant and out of the power loop, and hence socially inferior. Both have a point.)
Will there soon be lots of left wing blogs for us to link to and quarrel with? That would be something. Or will they all just be spoiler or defensive salaried offshoots of the mainstream media, like – and no offence is intended here, I’m just being descriptive – the Guardian’s web operations. (Mixed metaphor warning: can a mainstream have an offshoot? Make that journalistic treetrunk.)
