We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Another ad-hoc trans-Atlantic Blogger Bash

The Samizdata Team based in and around London was delighted to be able to meet famed blogger Joanne Jacobs and her daughter for lunch in Central London yesterday.

Joanne and her daughter looked on impassively whilst the Guardian journalists were burnt in effigy for their amusement.

Natalie Solent regaled the room with her ‘The time I went shopping and forgot to leave the Chieftain Tank’s hand brake on’ story.

Samizdata slogan of the day

Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign
– J.S. Mill, On Liberty

Tax: The view from Atlantis

Dale Amon has pointed out the interesting anti-tax We the People movement in the USA who are arguing against US taxes on arcane constitutional grounds. I have to say that whilst I certainly do wish them well, such arguments leave me cold.

The illegitimacy of most taxation springs from the illegitimacy of much of what states do, so arguing such matters on legalistic grounds actually legitimises the fact that the problem is one of incorrect laws rather than a fundamentally incorrect structure of the state. The nature of the illegitimacy of much taxation in the USA comes from its underlying immorality and immorality has nothing to do with constitutionality.

We the People are fighting their battle on grounds that concede from the outset wide areas of legitimacy to the state to tax provided the appropriate legal gymnastics are carried out first. I see what they are doing as useful in so far as it perhaps plants a seed of doubt in the minds of some as to the morality of the state to tax at all in the manner it does. They will of course lose the legal argument but perhaps to an incrementalist like me that is probably just as well: taxation is not wrong because this or that part of the constitution says so (or does not say so)… it is wrong because it is an immoral confiscation of several property for illegitimate uses. It is not a matter of law but rather a matter of objectively derived right and wrong.

Just a little reminder why Jordan is important

Not everywhere in the Islamic world forces women to hide under burqas.

 

As Jordanian society gradually evolves towards a more sophisticated extended order, I cannot think of an image more subersive and corrosive to the joyless Pan-Islamist world view than Queen Rania of Jordan: intelligent, elegant, articulate and Palestinian.

Call it a favour between friends

When I was a schoolboy some rather smug wag made me look utterly foolish by asking me which I thought would weigh more: a ton of steel or a ton of feathers? “Oh the steel, obviously” I said. Think about it.

Fast forward 25 years and the subject of steel is ruffling feathers in Britain and there must be something about this juxtaposition that makes an awful lot of people appear utterly foolish, most notably those that are spluttering with indignation about this ‘slap in the face’, ‘kick in the shins’, ‘punch up the trousers’ delivered to Britain by the US government’s decision to raise tarrifs. So much for the ‘Special Relationship’, eh.

So much for superficial analysis. Take a pill, John and Jane Bull, for this English patriot is far from ruffled.

This is not to say that British steel production is not significant. It is. In fact, in 1995 it was Britain was the third largest producer in the world. What is insignificant is British exports to the US which account for less than 4% of our total exports. The vast majority of British sales go to the domestic market or Europe.

The really big players in the US market are producers in countries like China and South Korea who, faced with the tarrifs, will turn to Britain and Europe to sell their far more attractively priced steel. That means that prices will drop for the British consumer and British steel producers will have to get leaner, meaner and more innovative in order to remain competitive.

In other words, it is good news for the British economy for precisely the same reason that it is bad news for the US one and, whilst it would be a stretch to suggest that this was Mr.Bush’s intention, it is his fellow Americans that he has ‘slapped in the face’ not us Brits.

Happy now?

Wanted: Lazar Berman’s version of Rachmaninoff’s Third Piano Concerto

I have loved Rachmaninoff’s Third Piano Concerto ever since I first heard it in my early teens, and I must have about twenty different CDs of it. My absolute favourite recorded performance of this piece is the CBS Lazar Berman/Claudio Abbado/London Symphony Orchestra version. Early reviewers complained about the “recording balance”, but for me the piano’s the thing and the piano is well to the front. (This was what the reviewers were complaining about.) And Berman plays it like a god.

The fashion nowadays tends to be to play this piece, yes, quite noisily, but basically too gently and carefully, as if vacuum cleaning around sleeping kittens, a state of affairs I hold Sergei Rachmaninoff himself responsible for. He was a fabulous pianist, one of the twentieth century’s best, but he was, I believe, shy about his own concertos, even when playing them. It was as if he couldn’t face going for broke when performing these majestic works (Number Two is also a super-popular piece), because what if people then didn’t like that? So, he would toss them off in a slightly detached albeit pianistically miraculous manner (described now as “aristocratic”), too quietly, too quickly, in a way that didn’t expose his own ego too much. Take it or leave it, folks. No skin off my soul!

Berman doesn’t make that mistake! By God he doesn’t. He storms the heavens, especially in the great first movement cadenza, and in that tempestuous passage near the end full of thunderous bass octaves that they made such a fuss of in that film about the mad Australian piano player played by the bloke who then played Queen Elizabeth I’s Spymaster in Elizabeth.

As Sod’s Law would have it, Lazar Berman’s is about the one recorded performance of this amazing piece of the classical repertoire that is not available currently on CD. It used to be, because about a decade ago I borrowed it from Pimlico library. And, I have it on a disintegrating CBS “cassette”, that technologically grotesque apology for a classical music recording medium. The number of the cassette is, if I’m reading the right bit: MYT 44715. It’s in the CBS Maestro series, and was recorded in 1977. CBS is now owned by Sony, of course.

Berman either became very fat and died of too much Russian-type drinking, or he is now very fat and will soon die of too much drinking, I forget which. Maybe this complicated his professional relationships, with e.g. the Sony Corporation, and keeping this performance available may have been too much bother for them. Or maybe Sony just didn’t like that he mostly recorded for Deutsche Grammophon. Or maybe those damn critics with their poor recorded balance nonsense have caused all those classical music sheep out there who have to read a critic before they know what they think not to want this wonderful performance.

A year or two back, BBC Radio Three did a “Which is the best version?” spot on CD Review, choosing, inevitably, Martha Argerich on Philips, which is very good I do admit, although personally I don’t care for the recorded balance – you can’t hear the piano clearly enough. But amazingly, the Berman version was mentioned favourably, even though it’s not now available. This is not something CD review does on regular basis and is high praise. At last, I thought. Maybe now they’ll reissue it. But no, still nothing doing.

The Internet is my obvious answer. But I’m not the brightest button on the corduroy jacket when it comes to this Internet stuff. I can write okay, but when I surf I tend to sink. I’m still paying by the minute for my phone calls, God help me. So, if anyone out there likes me, and also understands the Internet, please, please, get on your electric surfboard and find this CD for me! My limit is about £25. Preferred price: £0, from someone wanting to get some other personal preoccupation mentioned on Samizdata. In my opinion, the libertarian meta-context definitely includes discussion of personal preoccupations.

It doesn’t have to be an original Sony or CBS CD. A CD copy would do fine. (I still have the notes from my cassette.) I can’t believe, given that this CD is unavailable in the shops and that I’ve already paid for the cassette, that any sane person in the music business could object to that. Course not.

(There’s also a Berman performance of Rachmaninoff PC3 done live with Leonard Bernstein and the NYPO, which may still be available if you also buy a ton of other Bernstein performances, but I can’t go to about £150 for all of that, much as I’m tempted. I’ve not heard this, but an original or copy of that CD would also be extremely welcome. Same terms as above.)

Email me at brian@libertarian.co.uk if you can help.

Samizdata slogan of the day

Money is better than poverty if only for financial reasons.
– Woody Allen

St. Andrews is at it again

Last Tuesday night I had supper at the recently established Tim and Helen Evans home, the occasion being one of the trips to London made by the guys from the University of St. Andrews (in Scotland) Liberty Club, this time represented by Alex Singleton (who is English), Conyers Davis (Yank), and Marian Tupy (from Slovakia – unnervingly perfect English – reminded me of the actor Oscar Werner (Spy Who Came In From The Cold, Fahrenheit 451)). Great night. The combination of a real kitchen table in a real kitchen and bought-in food worked perfectly, what with Tim and Helen being very hardworking people themselves.

St. Andrews Liberty Club has, of course, a fine website (www.libertyclub.org.uk), and before doing this I took a look at their “quotes” section for the first time.

My favourite one, I think, because I hadn’t heard it before and because it’s quick, is: “An economy breathes through its tax loopholes.” – Dr. Barry Bracewell-Milnes. Dr. BBM is everything someone with a name like that should be. Elderly. Often bow tie. Posh voice. Knows everything to be known about the British tax system and the harm it does. (His latest publication, Euthanasia for Death Duties, is published by the Institute of Economic Affairs and is about the case for abolishing the British version of inheritance tax.) My favourite other Dr. BBM quote was said by him to me some years ago, about a piece called “Taxation is theft” (now Libertarian Alliance Political Notes No 44) by Libertarian Alliance Director Chris Tame. Said BBM, after a judicious pause: “This is one of the best pieces entitled ‘Taxation is Theft’ that I have ever read.”

Tim and I showed the St. Andrews trio how blogging works, of course using this as an example. They were impressed, and started to talk about maybe doing something similar themselves. With luck then, the world may soon be able to eavesdrop on all their rowing with their Vice Chancellor and with their local feminists, on their profound thoughts, their lives, their universe and their everything, even more easily than it can already via their website.

St. Andrews University is a big deal for the cause of liberty, because this is where the founders of the Adam Smith Institute met up and first got thinking around the late 1960s. (Alex Singleton has himself worked for the Adam Smith Institute.) Could something as big as that be emerging from the same place, again?

Something will surely come of it. One effect of blogging, the Internet, etc., seems to be to enable social networks, which got established and firmed up when the members of them were in daily physical contact, to remain in creative touch when their members disperse – a solution to the “How can we carry on doing this without stunting the rest of our lives?” problem common to all good times at University.

To recycle another Liberty Club Quote, this time from Edmund Burke: “When bad men combine, the good must associate.”

We want alternative energy…

Not bloody windmills, solar panels or cow shit furnaces, I mean real, usable and practical power: fuel cells and nuclear fusion.

John Ellis points out some excellent advances in fuel cell technology. Fuel cells are truly the wave of the future and I look forward to them gradually replacing not just batteries but the internal combustion engine for many uses one day.

I have always thought it was very revealing that we do not see protestors from the Green movement constantly holding up placards demanding more money be spent on fuel cell and nuclear fusion R&D.

        Thanks to ‘Darsh’ for the cool animated icon

Samizdata slogan of the day

If somebody starts shooting a gun at me, don’t expect me to defend myself with a condiment.
– Steve Daniels on pepper spray

Note: even pepper spray is illegal in the UK

The laser cannon comes of age

I don’t think I need to say much. Just read the story.

Yes, this is indeed the 21st Century.

Legalize Heroin: it’s life and death

How could I pass on such a friendly challenge?

I remember my mother telling me a story from her childhood. There was a woman just up the block, a sad case no one spoke of very much: a Morphine addict. The family kept her at home, got prescription “medication” from the local pharmacist… and tried to keep the whole thing as quiet as possible.

I imagine her life was pretty much a waste. I have no way of knowing the when of this. It was in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, some years before well intentioned people tried to “put an end” to such misery.

Some 60 years of drug prohibition later, I was a young Libertarian activist appearing on radio talk shows. Good intentions had resulted in a human disaster beyond the imagination of those unwittingly responsible for it. The percentage of the population using hard drugs hadn’t even changed. But the total population had grown and with drug users concentrated in ghettos it seemed as if drug use was an epidemic.

I made the comparison to the interviewer of that woman’s life sixty years ago versus what it would now be like for her.

She’d have left home and cut all ties with the famiily after having lost her job and alienated all her friends by begging and stealing money for her expensive criminalized habit. She’d be living in total squalor in an inner city squat with her pimp boyfriend. He’d be beating her for not turning enough tricks and they’d both be robbing houses, shoplifting and commiting other petty crimes to feed their habits. Their pusher would get it all. They’d have to dive for cover when the pusher’s gang fought gun battles in the ‘hood to protect a valuable territory against rival gangs. The local cops would be on the take from the gangs. Wholesalers and importers upstream would take care of the bigger payoffs to the DEA, the Coast Guard and governments of third world countries.

The couple would be re-using dirty needles and shooting up heroin of uncertain quality and random cut. Overdose, poisoning, hepatitis, violence, withdrawals on bad days… they’d be lucky to live to be thirty.

Little needs changed to update the description by twenty more years. In 2002 the couple are probably HIV positive; and the heroin importers are financing terrorist networks and buying nukes.

Yeah, the prohibition of hard drugs sure did improve the world…